---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---

---

In forex trading, many investors often encounter this dilemma: they try to imitate the strategies of top traders, only to find that these strategies don't work for them and may even result in huge losses. The reasons behind this are actually quite simple.

---

Every investor's trading experience and mental state are unique. As the saying goes, "It's hard to draw a cat or a tiger, but it's hard to copy its bones." No matter how realistically one imitates, one can never fully replicate the core essence of another. Top traders' strategies are often formed through long-term practice. They are not only based on a solid foundation of technical analysis, but also incorporate a deep understanding of the market and extensive practical experience.
More importantly, a trading system isn't a fixed formula; it needs to be adjusted according to changing market conditions. The market is dynamic, and no single trading strategy is always effective. The gap between investors and top traders isn't just in technical analysis. Significant differences can also exist in risk management, personal psychology, and execution capabilities. These differences, combined, can lead to significant differences between the performance of an average trader and an expert, even when using the same trading system.
Therefore, investors shouldn't simply assume that simply adopting someone else's profitable trading system will guarantee their own success. The effectiveness of a trading system isn't absolute; it needs to be tailored to the investor's individual characteristics. Sometimes, the best system is the one that best suits you. Investors should learn from others' experiences, combine them with their own circumstances, and gradually build and refine their own trading system. Only in this way can they find their own foothold in the volatile forex market and achieve stable investment returns.

In forex trading, the ability to accurately identify and abandon unsafe brokers is paramount to ensuring the safety of funds and avoiding trading traps.

---

Currently, some overseas forex platforms, upon entering the domestic market, operate under regulatory scrutiny. Lacking legal qualifications from Chinese financial regulators, their operating models lack effective oversight. To attract traders, they often offer high-leverage trading services. Furthermore, through the "AB position" mechanism, traders' funds are deeply tied to the platform's own interests, creating potential conflicts of interest. This risk directly determines whether traders can successfully realize their profits and even threatens the safety of their principal.
From the operational perspective of these unsafe platforms, "high leverage" and "AB position" are their core characteristics and primary sources of risk. On the one hand, the lack of regulatory oversight allows these platforms to operate without restrictions on leverage ratios, offering traders 50x, 100x, or even higher leverage. While high leverage can maximize short-term profit potential, it also significantly increases trading risk. Furthermore, these platforms often attract retail investors with limited risk awareness. Once the market fluctuates in the opposite direction, they are prone to significant losses, while the platforms profit from the traders' losses. On the other hand, the essence of the "AB warehouse" mechanism is that the platform divides orders into two categories based on the profitability of traders: if the trader has stable profitability, the platform will classify his orders as "A warehouse" and throw the orders to the external market, allowing the trader to compete with other market participants. Under this model, the trader's profits come from the market rather than the platform, so there will be no direct conflict of interest with the platform, and the cashing of funds is relatively safe; if the trader's profitability is weak or is in a loss-making state, the platform will classify his orders as "B warehouse" and will not pass the orders to the external market. Instead, the platform itself will act as the counterparty to "bet" with the trader - at this time, the trader's losses are directly converted into the platform's income. In order to achieve profitability, the platform may magnify the trader's losses through artificial slippage, delayed transactions, and other means, and even set withdrawal barriers when the trader makes substantial profits, ultimately resulting in the principal being "swallowed" by the platform.
In the AB warehouse mechanism, the "sell order mode" (i.e., A warehouse processing) is relatively safe. The core reason for this is that there is no direct conflict of interest between traders and the platform. Traders' profits come from other market participants, while the platform only earns a fixed spread cost by providing order sell services. Therefore, there is no need to worry about being maliciously restricted by the platform due to "excessive profits." However, it is important to note that under the sell order mode, the platform's profits are entirely dependent on the spread, which means that a "reasonable spread" is the foundation for the platform to continue providing sell order services. If a platform claims to offer "extremely low or even zero spreads," this fundamentally violates business logic. As a for-profit institution, if the platform cannot generate profits through the spread, it cannot afford the costs of selling orders to the market (such as fees for connecting with liquidity providers and trading system maintenance costs), and it will not "provide sell order services at a loss." These platforms, often offering "ultra-low spreads," are often disguised as "pure gambling platforms" (also known as "B-warehouse" platforms): they lack the ability to place orders in the external market and merely attract deposits through the gimmick of "low spreads." In reality, they profit from traders' losses through the gambling mechanism. After accumulating a certain amount of trader capital, they often suspend operations under the guise of "system maintenance" or "regulatory policy adjustments," absconding with funds, becoming typical "black platforms" in the market.
For traders, the key to identifying these unsafe platforms lies in breaking away from the misguided desire for a bargain and rationally examining the relationship between spreads and platform security. While excessively low spreads may appear to reduce transaction costs, they actually carry a significant risk of losing principal. These fraudulent platforms exploit traders' preference for "low-cost trading" by setting falsely low spreads to attract users and ultimately misappropriate their principal. Industry norms dictate that compliant forex brokers (even those operating under foreign regulatory frameworks) must set spreads that cover basic expenses such as liquidity access, technical maintenance, and compliance costs. Spreads for major currency pairs are typically maintained within a reasonable range (e.g., 1-3 pips for EUR/USD and 2-4 pips for GBP/USD). If a platform's spread is significantly lower than the industry average, or even consistently below 1 pip, one should be wary of its ability to effectively sell orders and the risk of a bet-back or abscondment scheme.
In addition, traders should consider other factors to comprehensively assess platform security: for example, whether the platform is strictly regulated by authoritative foreign regulatory bodies (e.g., the UK FCA, the US NFA, and Australia's ASIC) and whether it provides a regulatory ID for verification. They should also verify the platform's fund custody methods to ensure that trader funds are segregated from the platform's own funds (segregated custody is key to preventing the platform from misappropriating principal). Furthermore, they should monitor the platform's user reputation to determine whether there are numerous complaints of withdrawal difficulties or malicious slippage. Combining these dimensions with spread analysis can more comprehensively identify unsafe platforms and avoid the pitfalls of ignoring risks and enduring significant losses.
In summary, in forex trading, a trader's choice of broker directly impacts the security of their funds and their trading experience. To abandon unsafe forex brokers, one must not only identify obvious risks like "high leverage" and "AB position staking," but also look beyond the superficial "low spreads" and understand the inherent connection between the platform's profit model and security. Only by establishing a rational screening process and resisting the temptation of short-term gains can one avoid the traps of fraudulent platforms in a complex market environment and lay a secure foundation for implementing subsequent trading strategies and achieving profitability.

In the forex trading arena, traders who can maintain their position for 20 years are extremely rare.

---

For those traders who haven't achieved profitability over these long years, they are either exceptional individuals who navigate the market with extraordinary perseverance and strong self-control, or they possess a strong financial foundation capable of withstanding the immense pressures of market fluctuations.
These traders have experienced countless ups and downs and challenges in the market, developing a deep understanding of its complexity and uncertainty and possessing a profound perspective on many matters. However, they are often less inclined to engage in conversation, as the relentless grind of the market has long since smoothed their edges, rendering their stories less widely known.
Despite 20 years of experience, achieving stable profits remains uncertain. Time accumulation doesn't seem to directly translate into profitability; the market's complexity and uncertainty make achieving profitability a difficult task.
This demonstrates that success in forex investing depends not only on the accumulation of time but also on keen market insight, rigorous risk management, and a sound investment strategy. In the foreign exchange market, long-term survival does not necessarily mean long-term profitability. Long-term profitability requires investors to possess comprehensive capabilities in technical analysis, fundamental research, and psychological fortitude.

In the field of two-way foreign exchange trading, when some traders claim that "trading is simple," it doesn't mean they underestimate the market's complexity. Rather, it signifies that these traders have mastered the underlying principles of forex trading through long-term practice. This "simplicity" isn't simply a superficial convenience, but rather a "cognitive simplification" based on a deep understanding of market logic, strategy systems, and risk control. It represents a leap from "complex appearances" to "essential principles," rather than the superficial understanding that beginners simply "can operate without analysis."

---

In forex trading, there are indeed a few traders who believe that trading is "simple." Excluding the possibility that some individuals are deliberately disguising themselves and misleading others, these traders' sense of simplicity stems essentially from the accumulation of two core competencies: extensive market experience and strong analytical judgment. Their long-term trading experience has enabled them to witness the transitions between different market cycles (e.g., trends and fluctuations) and the impact of various unexpected events (e.g., central bank policy adjustments and geopolitical shocks) on exchange rates. They have gradually identified the common patterns of market fluctuations and developed a trading intuition that comes with practice. Their systematic analytical skills enable them to penetrate market noise, accurately identify key support and resistance levels, and judge the strength and continuity of trends. For example, when the market suggests "buy on dips," ordinary traders may be confused about the meaning of "low." However, these traders can identify the "appropriate buying point" through technical analysis (e.g., trend lines and moving average systems) and fundamental analysis (e.g., macroeconomic data and monetary policy expectations). Similarly, their analytical system can accurately identify the "high" in "sell on rallies." This ability to "view the market from a higher cognitive perspective" makes the previously complex decision-making process clear and straightforward, ultimately resulting in the appearance of "simple trading."
However, there are also voices in the market that advocate the uselessness of analysis, claiming that "technical and fundamental analysis are worthless." However, when questioned about the core logic behind opening and closing positions, they often fail to provide a reasonable answer. These arguments are neither based on rational judgments based on market laws nor on verifiable strategic signals. Instead, they fall into irrational beliefs such as "making decisions based on instinct," "guiding operations with so-called enlightenment," and "pursuing a metaphysical experience of harmony between man and nature." In today's highly developed internet and ever-increasing information transparency, such trading philosophies that depart from scientific logic clearly align with market fundamentals. While the foreign exchange market is influenced by numerous factors, it is not completely random. It exhibits clear trend characteristics over varying time periods (e.g., an upward trend on the daily chart and a volatile trend on the 4-hour chart). Technical analysis (e.g., candlestick patterns and indicator divergences) and fundamental analysis (e.g., interest rate differentials and inflation data) are the core tools for capturing these patterns and reducing trading randomness. If traders abandon analysis and rely solely on "randomly opening positions" without a clear trading logic and strict risk management, their account funds will eventually be depleted through "disorderly trading." For example, randomly opening positions in a volatile market without setting appropriate stop-loss orders can easily lead to significant losses due to frequent fluctuations. Randomly opening positions against the trend in a trending market can even deviate from the market trend, leading to persistent losses.
Furthermore, the concept of "trading consistency," often mentioned in forex trading, also needs to address common cognitive biases. Trading consistency doesn't mean a trading system is "unchanging and rigid," but rather that it can produce predictable and consistent results based on a unified logical framework under different market conditions. For example, a trend-following trading system, whose core logic is "follow the trend, enter on breakouts, and exit on stop-loss," can execute operations according to this logic in both uptrends and downtrends. Even if specific parameters (such as stop-loss margin and position size) may adjust due to market fluctuations, the core decision-making logic remains consistent. This is what true trading consistency means. It's worth noting that, compared to manual trading, the consistency of automated trading systems (EAs) relies on continuous optimization and adjustment. Because the market environment is subject to dynamic changes driven by macroeconomic factors, monetary policy, and liquidity, EAs that fail to update their parameters and strategy logic over a long period of time are prone to performance decline due to "environmental mismatch." Human traders, on the other hand, can adapt flexibly based on subjective judgment and adjust operational details according to market fluctuations. This embodies the core concept of "consistency is not rigidity": consistency is about "stability of the logical framework," not "fixed operational details."
In summary, the perception of "simple trading" in forex trading is a natural result of traders' accumulated skills, not a simplification of market fundamentals. The belief that "analysis is useless" defies scientific logic and will ultimately lead to disordered trading and losses. A correct understanding of "trading consistency" requires distinguishing between "stability of the logical framework" and "flexibility of operational details." For ordinary traders, only by abandoning irrational beliefs, focusing on accumulating experience and improving analytical skills, and building a consistent trading system can they gradually approach the cognitive level of "simple trading" and achieve the transition from "blind operations" to "rational trading."

In two-way trading in the foreign exchange market, different trading strategies correspond to distinct risk-return logics. The core essence of long-term, light-weight strategies is "risking small with a large investment," while short-term, heavy-weight strategies tend to favor "risking large with a small investment." This strategic difference is not unique to the foreign exchange market but also applies broadly to financial investments such as stocks and futures.

---

From the underlying logic of financial investment, the market's core attributes dictate that it is not a place for "risking large with a small investment" speculation, but rather a place for rational investment, "risking small with a large investment." However, in reality, many participants harbor a cognitive bias toward "risking large with a small investment." This mindset inherently reflects a strong speculative mentality and contradicts mature investment philosophy.
Speculation is typically characterized by the pursuit of short-term, rapid profits, attempting to leverage small capital for large gains. However, the results are often highly uncertain: only a very lucky few can achieve temporary bursts of wealth, while the vast majority of speculators, due to a lack of risk control, emotional decision-making, or misjudgment of market trends, ultimately suffer losses. In stark contrast, participants who adhere to a long-term investment philosophy, with proper planning and execution, are largely able to achieve steady growth in wealth. This growth isn't driven by the pursuit of short-term doubling or exorbitant profits, but rather by the long-term compounding effect of achieving a reasonable percentage of sustained appreciation based on the original principal. For example, annual returns consistent with the market's long-term average return are essential to gradually accumulating wealth. It's important to distinguish that extreme returns, such as doubling or tenfolding the principal, often associated with "getting rich," are inherently short-term outcomes of speculation, not the norm achieved through rational investment. The core goal of investment is the stable preservation and moderate growth of wealth, not the pursuit of unrealistic exorbitant profits.
From a more fundamental perspective, the financial market is essentially a resource allocation game centered around capital, exhibiting a "capital enrichment effect"—participants with more capital often have an advantage in terms of the difficulty and efficiency of obtaining returns. For example, if an investor has 100 million yuan in principal, achieving a 10 million yuan return (a 10% rate of return) annually is relatively easy thanks to their available resources, market influence, and flexible risk diversification capabilities. However, if an investor attempts to "gamble small, get big," hoping to earn 100 million yuan in returns (a 10x rate of return) on 10 million yuan in principal, this will be extremely difficult, even impossible. The core logic behind this is the principle that "profit and loss come from the same source": the higher the return multiplier sought, the exponentially greater the risk assumed. Any minor market fluctuation can be devastating to the principal. Achieving high returns relies not only on accurate market judgment but also on a significant element of luck. Such a low-probability event clearly cannot be a standard investment goal.
For participants in the financial markets, establishing reasonable investment goals and expectations is crucial. These goals must align with the size of their principal, their risk tolerance, and their ability to manage their positions. Only when goals, expectations, and actual operations form a closed loop can sustainable profits be achieved. Conversely, investors hoping to achieve "financial freedom" with a small capital of tens or hundreds of thousands of yuan often struggle to achieve their goal. The "wealth myths" circulating in the market are mostly isolated cases occurring under specific circumstances during specific periods of time and are not universally replicable. Excessive obsession with such myths is essentially a misunderstanding of market principles. Truly mature investment philosophy requires a clear understanding of the market's capital attributes and inherent risks, rejecting speculative fantasies of "getting rich overnight," and adopting a pragmatic approach based on sound planning. This requires balancing the stability of daily life with the steady accumulation of wealth through long-term, rational investment behavior. This is the core principle of investing in the financial markets, not the blind pursuit of short-term, speculative gains.

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---